Skip to main content

William and Eliza

William & Eliza's marriage record 1834

 Having explored William Wheelock's world and surmised what we can about his character, it is time to consider some of the gaps in his timeline and some of the people who knew him well. William's first wife, Eliza Whitehouse, presents one of the first mysteries. She's there and then she isn't and I have found scant details about who she was. Let's start with the base facts:

1) Eliza married William in Handsworth, St Mary's in 1834.

2) Her marriage record states she was of the parish.

3) She was living on Weaman Street with William and his family at the time of the 1841 census.

4) The 1841 census states she was born out of county.

Now moving on to the maybes:

5) She may have been born in 1811. The 1841 census certainly implies she was older than William. While the census takers were supposed to accurately record the ages of children, they were supposed to round down the ages of over 15s to the nearest 5. Many ignored this rule, however. William's age is recorded as 24, giving his inferred birth year as 1817, which was correct. Eliza's age is 30, so if this is accurate she would have an approximate birth year of 1811.

And onto the unknown:

6) Where she was born.

7) Who her parents are.

8) Why she and William do not appear to have had any children.

9) What happened to her. 

So, there are a lot of unknowns there. I have searched the records for an Eliza Wheelock, a challenge made doubly difficult by the fact that William's sister-in-law was also an Eliza Wheelock (1815-1903). In nearly all cases the Eliza that shows up is the latter, whose maiden name was Harvey. There is one possible record that might contain the correct Eliza and that is a record of a confirmation at St Chad's Roman Catholic Church in 1850. St Chad's is very close to Weaman Street. Eliza Harvey consistently baptised her children at CofE churches, so it seems less likely that this is her. So, if this is William's wife, it would mean she was still alive long after he started seeing Hannah, and was still relatively close by in 1850. 

If Eliza was still alive in 1850 it would preclude William from marrying Hannah, which would explain why I have found no marriage record. When William marries Mary Ann in 1869 he states he is a widower, so in this instance we can assume he was referring to Eliza rather than Hannah. Either he knew she was dead, assumed so, or simply regarded her as such given how long they'd been apart. 

I have searched for a death record for Eliza in the years from 1841 onward and turned up nothing. Perhaps she found a new man and took his name, perhaps she reverted to using Whitehouse, or perhaps she died and I simply haven't found the evidence yet.

It is interesting that I haven't found any evidence of children from William's first marriage. There are a number of reasons why this might be. They may simply have been unable to have children, or may have had stillborn children that were never registered, or the couple may have been kept apart for some reason, or the children died and I haven't been able to find them in the records. This could ultimately have caused the strain on the relationship that made William and Eliza part ways (assuming that's what happened). We know William could have children because he had two with Hannah. 

Another factor that may explain Eliza's disappearance of course may have been William's treatment of her, but this is pure conjecture based on his later treatment of Mary Ann. If William was abusive, Eliza may have sought refuge with family. Neither she nor William could legally remarry until the other died.

There is one possible glimpse of Eliza in the 1871 census. Living at number 41 Hospital Street is a lady named Eliza Elock. She lives alone, is 54, and is from Worcestershire. She is a metallic pen maker and claims to be widowed. Hospital Street is very near the Wheelock households and her birth in Worcestershire is consistent with what we know about Eliza been born outside Warwickshire. Her year of birth is 1817,  the same as William's, so this lady is a possible contender. Her unusual surname may be a poor transcription of her own pronunciation. 

Eliza Elock in the 1871 census


 If this is William's wife it would mean she was still alive when he married Mary Ann. 

This is as far as I've got identifying Eliza. There's a lot more work to do as she remains a total mystery. In the next post we will move on to William's paramour, Hannah Genders.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Madman?

 In my recent searches for William I happened upon the following newspaper article: Birmingham Daily Post, 21st May 1874 In 1874 William was hawking newspapers with his wife Ann, with whom he was living in the Gullet, Stafford Street. Nevertheless he is clearly still haunting his old home turf on Weaman Street as we learn he still frequents the Leopard Inn . Clearly he was aggressive towards the landlord, Mr Lummis, and, for whatever reason, wanted to break his mirror. We learn that Mr Lummis was frightened of William, and that William had made some serious threats to the man while wielding a carving knife. The word “madman” is used to describe William repeatedly in this article, even by William himself. He even demonstrates this by imitating a cuckoo. This piqued my interest as it reminded me of another of William’s arrests, way back in 1849, when funnily enough, he assaulted the landlord of the Old Still  on Weaman Street, threatening to kill him and also damaging his proper...

Hannah Morris

 Lately this blog has been focusing on William Wheelock and his world. In a total absence of clues to the identity of Hannah Genders, William seems a natural focus given he is the only person besides her son that knew Hannah personally (though I have no confirmation that John had any contact with her beyond infancy). As long as my searches for Hannah turn up nothing, I can at least explore the streets she walked on and learn about the man she had two children with.  Until I find confirmation of when Hannah died, I will assume she was alive for roughly the same timespan as William. I will also assume that for some reason or other–marriage or simply hiding from William–she was using a different name. I haven’t stopped searching for the name Genders and its variants, but I’ve turned up nothing so far. There are other possibilities of course. What if she was in the workhouse? What if she was a patient, like William, in some institution or another? Her presence may have been record...

Hannah Genders

 And so finally, we get to Hannah Genders, my 3x great grandmother. It would be hard for me to know less about Hannah. She has proven so elusive it has been much easier to prove who she wasn't rather than who she was. I only have two records that I know for sure relate to to my Hannah and they are the birth records of her children, Mary Hannah, and John. Mary Hannah Whilock birth (1846) So from this record I know that on the 8th April 1846, Hannah gave birth to her daughter at 22 Court, 8 House, Lionel Street. I know she was still there on the 9th May that year because that is when she registered the birth, and I know that she can't sign her name. The surname Wheelock is transcribed as Whilock, and she makes the claim that she is William's wife.  Mary Hannah Wheelock Death 1848   When Mary sadly died in 1848, she did so at her grandparents' home, Court 22, House 2, Weaman Street. Now although it states that Hannah Wheelock was present at the death, this almost certainly...